When the action disappears

Compare “The team made a decision to revise the guide” with “The team decided to revise the guide.” Both are understandable, but the second gives the action a direct place in the sentence. In the first, the action sits inside the noun “decision,” while the verb “made” does little work. This pattern often adds words without adding meaning.

Abstract nouns name ideas, qualities, processes, and results rather than physical objects. Many are useful: a discussion may genuinely be the subject of a paragraph, and a decision may be the thing you need to explain. Trouble begins when a noun takes over a job a verb could do more clearly. “The implementation of the plan began” may leave readers asking who implemented it and what they did first.

Find the verb hiding in the noun

A good first pass is to look for nouns that name an action: “analysis,” “evaluation,” “approval,” “improvement,” and “failure,” for example. Some have familiar endings such as -tion, -ment, or -ance, but spelling is only a clue. Ask what someone actually did. Did they analyze, evaluate, approve, improve, or fail to complete something?

Then look at the words around the noun. Phrases such as “conduct an evaluation,” “make an adjustment,” and “provide an explanation” often pair an action noun with a general-purpose verb. Try letting the action carry the sentence instead: “evaluate,” “adjust,” or “explain.” “We conducted an evaluation of the instructions” becomes “We evaluated the instructions.” The revision is shorter, but its real advantage is that the reader reaches the action sooner.

Put the person and the action together

Restoring a verb often reveals a second question: who is doing it? Consider “A review of the draft was completed before publication.” If you know the actor and it matters, write “The editor reviewed the draft before publication.” The revised sentence connects a person to a task. If the actor is unknown or unimportant, “The draft was reviewed before publication” may be enough. You do not need to invent an actor to make a sentence sound active.

This question is especially helpful in instructions. “Completion of the form is required before submission” asks readers to unpack two nouns before they can act. “Complete the form before you submit it” tells them what to do and when. The same approach works in ordinary explanations: “The committee’s approval of the proposal allowed work to begin” can become “The committee approved the proposal, so work could begin.”

Keep nouns that earn their place

The goal is not to remove every abstract noun. Sometimes a noun gives a name to an idea you will discuss across several sentences: “The revision took three rounds. The first addressed the opening.” Repeating “revised” would not necessarily make that passage clearer. A noun can also help you focus on a result rather than an actor: “The decision surprised everyone” is natural if the decision itself is your point.

Context matters, too. “The approval is still pending” may be clearer than a longer sentence if readers already know who must approve what. Before changing a noun, ask whether the new verb preserves the intended meaning. “Her analysis was careful” describes the quality of the analysis; “She analyzed carefully” shifts attention to how she worked. Either may fit, but they are not interchangeable in every paragraph.

Try a quick editing pass

Take a paragraph of your own writing and underline nouns that name actions or processes. For each one, write a possible verb in the margin. Next, ask who performs that action and whether the sentence tells readers what they need to know. Rewrite only the sentences that become clearer. You might change “There was a delay in the delivery of the files” to “The files arrived late,” or, if the cause matters, “We sent the files late.”

Finally, read the paragraph aloud. A useful revision usually makes it easier to follow who did what without flattening the rhythm or changing the emphasis. If turning every noun into a verb makes the passage repetitive, put some back. Clear editing is not a rule against abstract language; it is a way to make sure abstraction serves the reader rather than hiding the story of the sentence.

Back to category ↗